The Revolutionary Roots of Birth Control and Abortion

By Steve Farrell Prednisone For Sale Synthroid Generic Buy Neurontin Online Erythromycin Without Prescription Acomplia No Prescription Motilium For Sale Avapro Generic Buy Erythromycin Online Acomplia Without Prescription Hoodia No Prescription

Margaret Sanger, Birth Control Birth control appeals to the advanced radical because it is calculated to undermine the authority of the Christian Church. I look forward to seeing humanity free someday of the tyranny of Christianity no less than Capitalism.

- Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, "Birth Control and the Revolution," 1917

Liberty Letters Comment: Few recognize it, but the roots to creating legislative, judicial, and classroom support in favor of that which is immoral, and against that which is moral, or consistent with that most inspired of moral system, the Judeo-Christian ethic (as expounded most clearly by Christ), are so very often calculated, not to liberate man in the spirit of the American Revolution, but to enslave him in the spirit of the Marxist Revolution. This confession by Margaret Sanger is but one of so many that are out there for our serious consideration, if we just open our eyes and stop pretending that it doesn't matter. It does matter, it always has, and always will. We are in a war between good and evil, and we had better be up to it. Our civilization and our souls are on the line.

Filed under: Family, Politics, Feminism, Religion — Steve Farrell @ 2:56 pm

Print This Post | Other posts by Steve Farrell

3 Comments »

Your readers might be interested to know that chief among the enemies of the traditional family are those who adhere to the ideology of Marx and Lenin. For instance, many of the past and present leaders of the feminist (such as Bella Abzug, Shulamith Firestone, Gloria Steinham, and others)(20) and the homosexual (Harry Hay, Dennis Altman, Marshall Kirk, Erastus Pill, and others)(21) movements are, or were, Marxist. Karl Marx himself called for the "abolition of the family," in the Communist Manifesto,(22) so it should come as no surprise that an expert on Marxism, testified before Congress in 2003 that, "the planned destruction of the family was part of the communist agenda from its inception by Karl Marx and Frederic Engels."(23)

In a boast, Michael Walzer, bragged about some of the battles that Marxists have won in their war against family and western culture. For instance he bragged that through their efforts there has been, among other things he named, a "visible impact of feminism," an "emergence of gay rights politics, and . . . the attention paid to it in the media," "the transformation of family life, [including] rising divorce rates, changing sexual mores, new household arrangements-and, again, the portrayal of all this in the media," and the "legalization of abortion."(24)

While Marxism is an ideology in which men believe, it is also crucial to understand that it is also a conspiracy in which men participate.(25) Understanding this aspect of Marxism is vital to understanding: their tactics and strategy;(26) their use of agent provocateur's to provoke change in society and culture; and to gain the information vital to those seeking to oppose these Marxist change agents and their diabolical plans.

I mention all of this so that those who are seeking to preserve traditional families might get a better understanding of the enemy they are fighting. For the primary movers, or activists, seeking to abolish the family adhere to the ideology of Marx and Lenin. They seek to establish moral anarchy. Since the "perfect classless society" will supposedly be established upon the ashes of chaos and anarchy, moral anarchy is the goal. A "psy-ops war" is being conducted against us then, where infidelity, atheism, moral licentiousness, intemperance, civil corruption, greed, avarice, and ambition-personal, political, and national-are glorified and promoted-all in an effort to weaken us and our will to resist. The casualties in this war include not only their victims but those who have been pulled and thrust into new fields of action-hence the Marxist "peaceniks" have now mutated into environmental and NAMBLA activists-and new lines of thought-the moral relativists mutating into the worship of "self esteem", a belief in aliens, magic and "new age" psychology. These activists are shaking the faith, undermining morals, and polluting the lives of their victims who are then thrown so far off balance in their activities-economic, social, political and religious-that civilized society stands in danger of being overthrown.(27)

Further, the harm done by these social activists is not limited to those areas where they seek to advance "avant garde," or "vanguard of the proletariat," lifestyles and alternative family relationships. One study suggests that the influence of Marxist socialism and resultant socialist programs they are able to get governments to adopt, is enough by itself to deteriorate the family. For instance, that study suggests that the welfare state in Sweden has stripped the family of the economic benefits of having children, promoted lower fertility rates, and greater dependency upon paternal or "big brother government":

While a nation's family system may reorganize, for a time, around the nuclear "husband-wife" unit of reproduction, even that basis of independence eventually dissolves. The end result of state intervention is progressively diminished fertility, with living individuals left standing alone in a dependent relationship with the government.(28)

Further, socialistic intervention by government is often, and I would argue that it is usually, harmful. As one religious leader observed:

There are those who would define the family in such a nontraditional way that they would define it out of existence. The more governments try in vain to take the place of the family, the less effective governments will be in performing the traditional and basic roles for which governments are formed in the first place.(29)

In other words, if the traditional and proper role of government is to protect citizens in their life, liberty and property,(30) it becomes less effective the more it assumes a paternal role in society.

Marxism, in all its variants, is an enemy to the United States, western society and culture, and contrary to reports otherwise, is not dead but is instead actively engaged in seeking to destroy our society, culture, legal institutions, including those most fundamental to preserving a free society–marriage and the family. This understanding is vital to those interested in preserving these institutions.

—–
Notes
These Last Days Ministries. "Marxist roots of radical feminism." These Last Days Ministries. 19 Mar. 2005. These Last Days Ministries, Inc. 10 Apr. 2006 .

See also Roberts, Carey. "Feminist utopia, social nightmare." Renew America. 18 Jan. 2005. Carey Roberts. 22 Apr. 2006 .

As well as O'Leary, Dale. "Feminism." EWTN, Global Catholic Network. 1994. Trinity Communications. 10 Apr. 2006 .

21. Traditional Values Coalition. " Homosexuality 101: A Primer." Traditional Values Coalition. 2005. Traditional Values Coalition. 10 Apr. 2006 .

22. Marx, Karl, Engels, Friedrich. The Communist Manifesto. New York, NY: Signic Classic, 1998.

23. Wood, Bill. "Hearing Archives :Committee on Ways & Means :: U.S. House of Representatives :." Committee on Ways & Means. 22 Apr. 2006 .

24. Michael Walzer, as quoted by Griggs, William N. "The New American - Toward the Total State - July 5, 1999." The New American Magazine. 5 July 1999. American Opinion Publishing Incorporated. 22 Apr. 2006 .

25. See for example: Robison, John. Proofs Of A Conspiracy Against All The Religions And Governments Of Europe Carried On In The Secret Meetings Of Freemasons, Illuminati And Reading Societies. City: Kessinger Publishing, 2003; Barruel. Memoirs Illustrating The History Of Jacobinism. City: Real-View-Books, 1995; Billington, H., James. Fire In The Minds Of Men. City: Basic Books, 1983.

26. It is also instructive to note the influence these change agents had upon pre-war Germany and the Nazi Party. See for instance, Lively, Scott, Kevin Abrams. The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party. City: Veritas Aeterna, 2002. See also Lively, Scott. Homosexuality and the Nazi Party. 13 July 2003. Leadership U. 22 Apr. 2006 .

28. Carlson, Allen. " What Has Government Done to Our Families? - Mises Institute." Mises Institute. 2003. 22 Apr. 2006 .

30. 'That the sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the citizen in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property, and when the government assumes other functions it is usurpation and oppression." Alabama State Constitution. Art. I Sec 35

For some reason the URL/Link mentioned directly above didn't make it through. I'll try again:

November 22, 2006

3 Comments »

Your comment